Which VPN is best for GrapheneOS? A pragmatic, slightly geeky review
GrapheneOS is not your average Android flavor — its a security- and privacy-hardened mobile OS with a healthy distrust of conveniences that leak metadata like breadcrumbs. Picking a VPN for GrapheneOS is therefore less about marketing buzzwords and more about compatibility with hardened system behavior, minimal trusted code, auditability, and sane privacy practices. Below I lay out what matters, then review a short list of top candidates, and finish with a compact comparison table so you can choose without needing a debugger attached to your brain.
What a VPN must do for GrapheneOS users
- Respect threat model: no-logs, independent audits or verifiable transparency, and privacy-friendly jurisdiction are high priority for many GrapheneOS users.
- Low trust client code: open-source client apps (or the ability to use standard open projects like WireGuard/OpenVPN) let you inspect or rebuild the app for minimal surprises.
- WireGuard support: WireGuard gives simpler, auditable crypto and convenient key management. GrapheneOS runs it fine via the official app.
- APK accessibility: Providers that publish APKs or support F-Droid-like install workflows are preferable if you prefer not to use the Play Store.
- Always-on per-app behavior: GrapheneOS supports always-on VPN and per-app firewalling pick a provider whose Android client plays nicely with those features.
- Payment options: anonymous payment (cash-by-mail, crypto) is a big plus for privacy maximalists.
Top picks — short reviews
Mullvad — the privacy-first, nerd-approved choice
Why it fits GrapheneOS: Mullvad offers anonymous accounts, cash and crypto payments, first-class WireGuard support, and an open-source client. The company keeps minimal metadata and documents their approach to logging and transparency. Mullvad also publishes clear help pages on using WireGuard and their Android app, which makes it easy to install on a GrapheneOS device via an APK if you prefer side-loading.
Strengths: privacy-first, simple pricing, excellent WireGuard workflow, client source availability.
Drawbacks: No fancy streaming unblocking in some regions — this is privacy-first, not media-first.
Website: mullvad.net
Proton VPN — polished, audited, Swiss base
Why it fits GrapheneOS: Proton has a solid privacy pedigree (Proton Mail), a presence in Switzerland (strong privacy laws), and ongoing security-focused communications. Their apps support WireGuard and the Android client is mature. Proton also runs audits and publishes security info.
Strengths: polished client, extra privacy features, strong infrastructure. Drawbacks: not as anonymous-by-default as Mullvad (account-based), some parts of ecosystem larger and thus more to trust.
Website: proton.me/vpn
IVPN — a balanced, privacy-respecting option
Why it fits GrapheneOS: IVPN emphasizes privacy, publishes transparency information, supports WireGuard, and offers thoughtful Android behavior. They have a smaller, privacy-focused team which often appeals to GrapheneOS users.
Strengths: privacy-centered, good Android support, clear policies. Drawbacks: price is slightly higher for the same feature set.
Website: ivpn.net
OVPN — Swedish, simple, and thorough
Why it fits GrapheneOS: OVPN is a professional, privacy-conscious Swedish provider with an uncomplicated approach to logs and access controls. They publish transparency reports and offer WireGuard support. Their focus is on reliable privacy rather than flashy consumer features.
Strengths: strong operational security, straightforward policies. Drawbacks: Europe-based jurisdictions have different legal frameworks people with particular threat models should assess legal risk.
Website: ovpn.com
Self-hosted WireGuard — the maximal control option
Why it fits GrapheneOS: If you want minimal third-party trust, run your own WireGuard server on a VPS or at a colocated host. You control keys, logs (you decide whether to retain any), and endpoint configuration. The official WireGuard Android app is open-source and works great on GrapheneOS.
Strengths: maximum control and auditability excellent performance. Drawbacks: single endpoint means your IP can be associated with your traffic unless you chain providers or use distributed setups higher operational complexity.
WireGuard: wireguard.com
What to avoid or be cautious about
- Large, opaque providers that dont publish audits or client source code if your threat model demands verifiability.
- Free VPNs with opaque business models (ad injection, data monetization). GrapheneOS users tend to prefer paying for privacy.
- Assuming Play Store installs equal safety — check whether the provider publishes APKs or the client is open-source so you can verify or side-load if desired.
Technical tips when configuring a VPN on GrapheneOS
- Use the official WireGuard app (open-source) when possible. It integrates well and minimalizes extra proprietary code on device.
- Enable GrapheneOSs Always-on VPN and Block connections without VPN if you want a strict fail-safe.
- Test for DNS leaks and IPv6 behavior after setup (some providers handle IPv6 differently you may prefer IPv6 disabled on the VPN endpoint.)
- If you need per-app VPN, prefer providers that support Android split-tunnel features or use GrapheneOSs per-app network controls to enforce policy.
Comparison table (quick reference)
| Provider | WireGuard | Open-source client | Anonymous payment | Audits / transparency | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mullvad | Yes | Yes (client source public) | Yes (cash, crypto) | High (transparent policies) | Excellent privacy-first choice for GrapheneOS users |
| Proton VPN | Yes | Parts open-source / documented security practice | Crypto, cards | Audits and security docs published | Polished client and strong infrastructure |
| IVPN | Yes | Yes / transparent | Crypto | Good transparency | Small, privacy-focused operator |
| OVPN | Yes | Some client code public | Cards, crypto | Transparency reporting | European operator with strong ops security |
| Self-hosted WireGuard | Yes (obviously) | WireGuard app is open-source | Depends on your VPS provider | Fully under your control | Best for advanced users wanting minimal trust |
Final verdict — which one to pick?
If you want a short answer with a microphone-drop and a pocket protector: Mullvad is the best starting point for most GrapheneOS users who value privacy and minimal third-party trust. It combines anonymous account creation/payment options, open-source-friendly tooling, solid WireGuard support, and a transparent approach.
If you prefer a polished app ecosystem, extra features, and a strong legal posture in Switzerland, Proton VPN is an excellent alternative. If absolute control over the endpoint is your obsession, self-hosted WireGuard gives you the last word.
Whichever you choose, configure GrapheneOSs always-on and block-plain-traffic options, prefer open-source clients (or verify APKs), and test for leaks. Your phone is a tiny supercomputer — make sure its network habits match the level of secrecy youd tell your future self about in a safe place.
Further reading and sources
- GrapheneOS usage VPN guidance: grapheneos.org/usage/vpn
- WireGuard: wireguard.com
- Mullvad VPN: mullvad.net
- Proton VPN security info: proton.me/security
- IVPN: ivpn.net
- OVPN: ovpn.com
- OpenVPN for Android (community client): github.com/schwabe/ics-openvpn
Remember: a VPN is only one layer in your privacy stack. GrapheneOS gives you a great foundation pick a VPN that complements it rather than trying to paper over a different problem. Now go secure your packets — and try not to snort when someone says trust us without publishing source code or transparency reports.
Be the first to leave a comment